Informed, advance refusals of treatment by people with severe mental illness in a randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans: demand, content and correlates
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND In the UK, crisis planning for mental health care should acknowledge the right to make an informed advance treatment refusal under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Our aims were to estimate the demand for such treatment refusals within a sample of service users who had had a recent hospital admission for psychosis or bipolar disorder, and to examine the relationship between refusals, and service user characteristics. METHODS To identify refusals we conducted content analysis of Joint Crisis Plans, which are plans formulated by service users and their clinical team with involvement from an external facilitator, and routine care plans in sub-samples from a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of Joint Crisis Plans (plus routine mental health care) versus routine care alone (CRIMSON) in England. Factors hypothesised to be associated with refusals were identified using the trial data collected through baseline interviews of service users and clinicians and collection of routine clinical data. RESULTS Ninety-nine of 221 (45%) of the Joint Crisis Plans contained a treatment refusal compared to 10 of 424 (2.4%) baseline routine care plans. No Joint Crisis Plans recorded disagreement with refusals on the part of clinicians. Among those with completed Joint Crisis Plans, adjusted analyses indicated a significant association between treatment refusals and perceived coercion at baseline (odds ratio = 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.43), but not with baseline working alliance or a past history of involuntary admission. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated significant demand for written treatment refusals in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005, which had not previously been elicited by the process of treatment planning. Future treatment/crisis plans should incorporate the opportunity for service users to record a treatment refusal during the drafting of such plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN11501328 Registered 13th March 2008.
منابع مشابه
Joint crisis plans for people with psychosis: economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial
OBJECTIVE To investigate the cost effectiveness of joint crisis plans, a form of advance agreement for people with severe mental illness. DESIGN Single blind randomised controlled trial. SETTING Eight community mental health teams in southern England. PARTICIPANTS 160 people with a diagnosis of psychotic illness or non-psychotic bipolar disorder who had been admitted to hospital at least ...
متن کاملEffect of joint crisis plans on use of compulsory treatment in psychiatry: single blind randomised controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether a form of advance agreement for people with severe mental illness can reduce the use of inpatient services and compulsory admission or treatment. DESIGN Single blind randomised controlled trial, with randomisation of individual patients. The investigator was blind to allocation. SETTING Eight community mental health teams in southern England. PARTICIPANTS ...
متن کاملJoint Crisis Plans reduce coercive treatment
Methods Design: Single blind randomized controlled trial. Setting: Eight community mental health teams in southern England. Participants: 160 people with psychotic or bipolar disorder who had had a hospital admission within the previous two years. Intervention: The joint crisis plan was formulated by the patient, care coordinator, psychiatrist, and project worker and contained contact informati...
متن کاملJoint crisis plans for people with borderline personality disorder: feasibility and outcomes in a randomised controlled trial.
BACKGROUND People with borderline personality disorder frequently experience crises. To date, no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of crisis interventions for this population have been published. AIMS To examine the feasibility of recruiting and retaining adults with borderline personality disorder to a pilot RCT investigating the potential efficacy and cost-effectiveness of using a joint c...
متن کاملA joint crisis plan negotiated with mental health staff significantly reduces compulsory admission and treatment in people with severe mental illness.
Intervention: Joint crisis plan: contained information on contact details, history of mental and physical illnesses, previous antidepressants and psychotherapies, signs predicting relapse, and instructions for care if a future relapse occurs. The plans were developed by negotiation and agreement between mental health staff and the person with severe mental illness. A carer, friend, or advocate ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 17 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017